contributory negligence การใช้
- The third element requires the absence of contributory negligence from the plaintiff.
- Under the doctrine of contributory negligence, the plaintiff's negligence is a complete defense.
- Contributory negligence is generally a defense to a tort of negligence.
- Instead the conduct amounted to contributory negligence, which is not a complete defence.
- Contributory negligence is no defence in an action for deceit.
- Contributory negligence of the aggrieved person might be a defence.
- In other countries it can give rise to a partial defence of contributory negligence.
- In modern case law, contributory negligence is compared to the injury caused by the other.
- Indiana applies pure contributory negligence to medical malpractice cases and tort claims against the state government.
- Contributory negligence, for example, could deprive a plaintiff of a legal remedy against a negligent defendant.
- Indian Courts recognise the concept of contributory negligence.
- In Australia, contributory negligence is available when the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to its own injuries.
- At the same time, the teacher's award of damages was reduced due to his contributory negligence.
- Determining the extent of the contributory negligence is subjective and heavily dependent on the evidence available.
- The judge held that it was contributory negligence.
- In the United States, the pure contributory negligence only applies in Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia.
- He would have been defeated by his own contributory negligence and by the doctrine of common employment.
- This is known as pure contributory negligence.
- The only certain difference is that the defence of contributory negligence is unavailable in a deceit action.
- The question of contributory negligence on the part of the deceased was also one for the jury.
- ตัวอย่างการใช้เพิ่มเติม: 1 2 3